Saturday, August 16, 2014
Jodi Byrd, from Transit of Empire: Indigenous Critiques of Colonialism (2011)
For the Chickasaw, who have
negotiated and survived [the colonial-imperial territorial] system for over
four hundred and fifty years, the intersubstantiations of sovereignty and
relationship that connect community to ancestral place and belonging arise from
the ontologies of reciprocal complementarity, Upper and Lower Worlds, that
inflect and shape this world through balance and haksuba [or the Chickasaw dialectic between Upper and Lower Worlds
that materializes in the human world as cacophony]. Movement across land and
time was tied to the night sky and a deep awareness of the celestial order of
spiral galaxies even as that movement traversed rivers and mountain ranges on
ceremonial cycles of death and rebirth. Sovereignty, in the context of such
philosophies, is an act of interpretation as much as it is a political
assertion of power, control, and exception. That interpretation is an act of
sovereignty is well known and practiced by the imperial hegemon that uses
juridical, military, and ontological force to police interpretation and
interpellate what is and is not seen, what can and cannot be said. Indigenous
critical theory stands in the parallax gap created when US empire transits
itself in the stretch between perceptions of the real to interpret and will against the signifying systems that render
“Indianness” as the radical alterity of the real laid bare.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment